Thursday, March 1, 2012

Hugo, Darling of the Oscars


            It’s no surprise to me that Hugo was nominated in almost every single category in the Oscars this year. It’s also no surprise that the only awards it actually won were unrelated to the story, the acting or general editing of the movie itself. No, the awards that Hugo won were the ones it deserved – Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, Cinematography, Visual Effects, and Art Direction. These are honestly the only reasons that Hugo was at all an enjoyable experience for me. Other than that, Hugo was a dreadful bore.
            Let’s start out with the story. The critics praised this movie to no end. On Rotten Tomatoes right now, you can read dozens of critics singing the wonders of Hugo’s story. I, unfortunately, am not a huge movie history buff, I don’t know much about the beginnings of film. Therefore, the whole backtrack into the “glorious beginnings of film” and the famous (albeit not so famous to me) early director did not have any inherent appeal to me. However, that’s not to say that I didn’t find it interesting, or that there is no world in which an incredibly interesting story could be told about that director.
            But here’s the thing… the movie is called “Hugo.” I went into it expecting to be about the story of this little boy, this apparently exceptional little boy who runs around a train station keeping the clocks running and working on a mysterious mechanical man. It turns out that was merely a prologue, a sidetrack to the real story of the movie – Georges Melies. I was completely sucked in by the movie’s visuals from the beginning, and this plucky little boy running around collecting what looked like clockwork pieces really intrigued me. When the irritable old man running the shop took his notebook, I assumed that was going to be a major plot point. SPOILER – he never gets it back. His only reminder of his dead father is never mentioned again as if it’s unimportant. Even if the plans for the mechanical man are not important, it would be important as a sentimental keepsake at least!
            Besides that, the movie seems to gloss over the incredibly sad life of the little boy in order to focus on the golden years and subsequent fall from grace of the old director. He lives alone in a train station after his loving father dies, and his alcoholic, abusive uncle disappear. His life is a constant struggle. Merely finding food is a trial for him, and if he gets caught by the surprisingly silly old policeman (more on this later), he will get locked in a cage and sent to an orphanage, set up to seem more like a prison than anything else.
            This sad story however, is not what sticks in my mind by the end of the movie. Instead, I’m left with the story of Georges Melies, his interest in movies and then his money troubles. I also remember sighing, fidgeting and looking at the walls of the movie theater a lot. I remember taking off my 3D glasses to try and compare the 3D view with the blurry regular view. Then again, I was very bored.
            Beyond the story, the pacing was just awful. It took forever for anything to happen. It just seemed like for long periods of time characters would just look at each other without saying anything. Then they would look into the distance. Then they would slowly walk around the room. Now, nothing is wrong with this usually, if it all serves a purpose and is well done. Unfortunately, the movie didn’t do a very good job of keeping me appraised of which character I should care most about at any one time. Is it Hugo? Is it Melies? Is it Isabelle, the little girl? (By the way, I generally like this actress, but her accent and her acting were just atrocious in this movie. It was a truly unpleasant experience to watch her on the screen.) Without this knowledge, I can’t read the correct emotions, the correct relationships I need to in order to feel the correct emotion as the viewer.
            In addition to the slow pacing, there seemed to be at least a few moments that were really built up and then had absolutely no payoff. As I already mentioned, the notebook in the beginning seemed to be of great importance. Hugo begged for it, screamed for it, demanded it. When he thought it was burned up, Hugo was CRUSHED. But, like I said above, that quickly fizzled away into the story of Georges Melies. I cared about that notebook and about Hugo finding it. Then it just disappeared into nothing. A similar moment of buildup is the beautiful and iconic scene where the mechanical man flies through the air. (He flies through the air for about 10 minutes, you can’t miss it. There’s that pacing thing again.) The slow motion builds up your emotion, builds up your expectation to see something terrible happen to that machine. Hugo trips and grasps at it, but it flies through the air. Everyone’s eyes follow it as it arcs up and then finally down. I was wondering, “Will someone catch it!? What will happen to it if no one does?!?” Then the machine simply falls with an anticlimactic clunk. It’s not even visibly dented, and the precise machinery was unaffected. So much buildup with all the slow motion occurred for that one moment, and the stakes ended up being very low. It was disappointing.
            Now to return to the character of the policeman. Sacha Baron Cohen is a pretty funny guy, and he definitely had his moments in this movie. I definitely found myself laughing when he was in the bathtub. His facial expressions and timing are often pure gold. However, that is all when the humor is based on his acting skills. What made this character troubling for me is that much of the time I felt like I was supposed to laugh at him because he had a bad leg. It felt like I was supposed to say “HAHA he’s handicapped because he fought in a war. It’s okay that I’m laughing about that because he’s kind of a douche to orphan children.” The problem here is the opposite of the problem with the pacing. I think I knew how I was supposed to feel about that character, but to be honest, it just felt wrong.  
            That said, again, the visuals were simply stunningly beautiful. 100% top notch. I’m not really a huge fan of 3D, but I was definitely blown away by the cinematography and the environments that I got to see for this movie. Watching the mechanical man work, watching the train fly through the station, watching the clocks ticking, the bustling crowds in the station – it was all wonderful. I just wish the rest of the movie was as impressive as the visuals.